Images as Politeness Mechanisms: Insights from Visual Communication in Online Interactions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSSH242558Keywords:
Politeness, Emojis, Social media, Online interaction, Multimodal discourseAbstract
This study explores how people use imagery to convey politeness and manage social relationships in online interactions. Three research questions guided the study. Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Multimodal Discourse and Locher and Watts’ Relational Work are the theoretical models adopted for the study. Ten Whatsapp conversations containing emojis formed the data for the research. The conversations were purposively selected because of their relevance to the study. Descriptive survey and qualitative method are employed. The findings reveal that emojis play a significant role in enhancing the tone and intent of messages, allowing users to convey politeness and friendliness in digital communication and images interact with linguistic elements to create cohesive messages. The findings of this study inform the development of more effective online communication strategies, improve online relationships, and enhance understanding of the complex dynamics of online interaction. Individuals are charged to use emojis strategically in digital communication to enhance politeness and convey emotional tone. Emojis should also be in different cultural contexts. More studies should be carried out to explore variations in politeness strategies.
Downloads
References
André, P.; Cutrell, E.; Tan, D. S.; and Smith, G. (2009). “Designing novel image search interfaces by understanding unique characteristics and usage.” In Proc. INTERACT 2009, ACM P. 340 – 353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03658-3_40
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Cefaratti-Bertin, S. (2024). “More than just a smiley face: how emojis can affect communication.” Baylor University Media and public relations, 254-327-8012. Retrieved on 30/08/2024.
Chew, B.; Rode, J. A.; and Sellen, A. (2010). “Understanding the everyday use of images on the web.” Proceedings: NordiCHI 2010, October; 16 – 20.
Cutting, J. (2008). Pragmatics and discourse. 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.
Cunningham, S. J., & Masoodian, M. (2006). “Looking for a picture: an analysis of everyday image information searching.” In Proc. JCDL 2006, ACM P. 198 – 199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1141753.1141797
Datta, R., Li, J., and Wang, J. Z. (2005). “Content-based image retrieval: approaches and trends of the new age.” In Proc. MIR 2005, ACM P. 253 – 262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1101826.1101866
Dowlatabadi, H.; Mehri, E.; and Tajabadi, A. (2014). “Politeness strategies in conversation exchange: the case of council for dispute settlement in Iran.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98; 411 – 419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.434
Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. New York: Rutledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Ella, S. M. (2023). “Locher and Watts’ Relational Work Theory.” In S. A. Akinwotu, E. O. Olajimbiti, B. Ogoala, J. Amodu, R. Oji, and C. Onyema (Eds.). Politeness Concepts, Models and Theories (Theory and Practice of Pragmatics Series), Vol. 2.
Ezeifeka, C. (2018). Discourse analysis: concepts and approaches. Awka, Nigeria: Patrobas.
Fauzi, M. I. (2010). A Politeness strategy analysis on the main characters’ dialogs of the movie Pirates of Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest. Jakarta: Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University.
Felix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2008). Politeness in Mexico and the United States: a contrastive study of the realization and perception of refusals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.171
Harris, M. (1990). Emics and etics revisited. In T. Headland, K. Pike & M. Harris (Eds.). Emics and etics:the insider/outsider debate, 48 – 61. Newbury Park: Sage.
Jones, R. H. (2021). “Multimodal Discourse Analysis.” In The Encyclopedia of Aplied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0813.pub2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0813.pub2
Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: the modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold Publishers.
Lakoff, R. and Ide, S. (Eds.). (2006). Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.139
Leech, G. N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
Locher, M. A. and Watts, R. J. (2005). “Politeness theory and relational work.”Journal of Politeness Research1(1),9 – 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
Liu, Y., and Cheng, L. (2021). Semiotics in visual communication: review of Doing Visual Analysis. Semiotica, 2021(242). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2021-0024
Mills, S. (2003), Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238
Newman, E. J. and Schwarz, N. (2024). “Misinformed by images: How images influence perceptions of truth and what can be done about it.” Current Opinion in Psychology 2024, 56:101778. www.sciencedirect.com. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101778
Nta, E. G. and Ekpa, A. E. (2008). “The dynamics of politeness in sociolinguistics: Theethnographic dimension.” In E. Okon and M. Okon (Eds.) (2nd Ed.). Topical issues insociolinguistics: The Nigerian Perspective. Aba: NNL.
Odebunmi, A. (2002). “The pragmatics of face – acts in a Nigerian universityadministration.” S. Babatunde andD. Adeyanju (Eds.). Language, meaning and society. Ilorin: Haytee Press and Publishing Co. Nig. Ltd.179 – 192.
Odebunmi, A. (2009). “Politeness in print media political interviews in Nigeria.” California Linguistic Notes; XXXIV (1).
Pishghadam, R. and Navari, S. (2012). “A study into politeness strategies and politeness markers in advertisements as persuasive tools.” editerranean Journal of Social Sciences. 3 (2). DOI:10.5901/mjss.2012.v3n2.161 . 161 – 171.
Portia, M. (2006). “Browsing large collections of images through unconventional visualization techniques.” In Proc. AVI 2006, ACM P. 440 – 444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1133265.1133354
Probosini, N. (2020). Politeness strategies in the main characters of “The Devil Wears Prada” Movie. InJournal ASPIKOM, P-ISSN: 2087-0442, E-ISSN: 2548-8309 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v5i1.516, 5 (1), 166 – 175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v5i1.516
Pu, H. T. (2008). “An analysis of failed queries for Web image retrieval.” Journal of Informative Science 34(3), 275 – 289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507084140
Spencer-Oatey, H., and Franklin, P. (2009). Intercultural interaction. A multidisciplinary approach to intercultural communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Harris, M. (1990). Emics and etics revisited. In T. Headland, K. Pike & M. Harris (Eds.). Emics and etics:the insider/outsider debate, 48 – 61. Newbury Park: Sage.
Udoudom, U.; William, G.; Igiri, A.; Okon, E.; and Aruku, K. (2024). “Emojis and miscommunication in text-based interactions among Nigerian youths.” Journal of informatics and web-engineering. 3(1):226-240. Doi:33093/jiwe.2024.3.1.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33093/jiwe.2024.3.1.15
Ugochukwu, C. N. (2017). “Theory of politeness.” In B. M. Mbah (Ed.). Theories of contextual linguistics: articles in honour of Professor Gabriella Ihuaruugo Nwaozuzu. 176 – 185.
Watts, R. J., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (Eds.) (2005) (2nd Ed.). Politeness in language: studies in its history, theory and practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199819
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Scientific Research in Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
